The New York Times is amending its copyright complaint against OpenAI and Microsoft, clarifying claims of contributory infringement in light of recent Supreme Court rulings. The NYT alleges Microsoft encouraged OpenAI to steal its works by building a powerful supercomputing system. The move comes after a Supreme Court decision set a new standard for contributory infringement, requiring proof of intentional inducement of illegal conduct. This case is significant because it tests the boundaries of AI companies’ use of copyrighted materials, and its outcome could have far-reaching implications for the future of AI development, Why it matters: the ruling could set a precedent for how AI companies are held accountable for copyright infringement.
NYT Updates Suit
The New York Times is amending its copyright complaint against OpenAI and Microsoft, clarifying claims of contributory infringement in light of recent Supreme Court rulings. The NYT alleges Microsoft encouraged OpenAI to…
Summarized from
Ars Technica AI AI-summarized
Was this helpful?
Discussion
Join the conversation
Comments are powered by GitHub Discussions. You need a GitHub account to participate.
Go deeper
The sharpest AI news, curated daily.
One email each morning. Summarized, sourced, and skimmable in under three minutes.
The sharpest AI news, curated daily.
One email each morning. Summarized, sourced, and skimmable in under three minutes.